Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Scientific Research (2010): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact from the director's initial denial. The petitioner's appeal brief did not address the director's specific findings and instead repeated arguments from the original petition. Additionally, new evidence submitted on appeal could not be considered as it related to events that occurred after the petition's filing date.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Major Internationally Recognized Award Original Contributions Of Major Significance Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.