dismissed EB-1A Case: Ship Modeler

identifying data deleted to 
ilrevent clearly unwarranted 
invQsion of perlonal prlvaoy 
T'tmLIC COP" 
DATE: MAR 2 2 2012 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER 
INRE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: 
u.s. Department of Homeland Security 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 
20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
FILE: 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to 
Section 203(b)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act; 8 U.S.C. § 1 1 53(b)(1)(A) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the 
documents related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please 
be advised that any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. 
If you believe the law was inappropriately applied by us in reaching our decision, or you have additional 
information that you wish to have considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. 
The specific requirements for filing such a request can be found at 8 C.F.R. § 103.5. All motions must be 
submitted to the office that originally decided your case by filing a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or 
Motion, with a fee of $630. Please be aware that 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i) requires that any motion must 
be filed within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider or reopen. 
Th,ank you, '. ", t 
\ . .;"v, 
~ 
Perry Rhew 
Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
www.uscis.gov 
,> • 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The approval of the employment-based immigrant visa petition was revoked by 
the Director, Texas Service Center, on March 10, 201l. The director dismissed the petitioner's 
motion to reopen on May 13,2011, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on 
appeal. The appeal will be summarily dismissed. 
The petitioner seeks classification as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 
203(b)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(1)(A), as an 
alien of extraordinary ability as a ship modeler. On Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, 
counsel indicated in Part 2 that he was filing an appeal and his "brief and/or additional evidence 
will be submitted to the AAO within 30 days." Moreover, counsel indicated in Part 3 that he 
would "submit supporting documents along with a legal brief within 30 days." Finally, in 
counsel's accompanying cover letter, he "request[ed] 30 days before we can file a legal brief 
along with the supporting documents." Counsel dated the appeal on June 13, 2011. As of this 
date, approximately nine months later, the AAO has received nothing further. Accordingly, the 
record is considered complete as it now stands. 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party 
concerned fails to identifY specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the 
appeal. Counsel here has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for revocation and has not 
provided any additional evidence. As counsel for the petitioner has failed to provide any specific 
statement or argument regarding the basis of his appeal, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.