EB-1A Dismissed — Somatic Science: the petitioner's evidence, consisting of anecdotal
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner's evidence, consisting of anecdotal testimonials, materials from a website of unknown significance, and certificates from entities of unknown repute, was insufficient to meet any of the required regulatory criteria. The AAO also noted that the petitioner failed to provide properly certified translations of foreign documents as required. Additionally, it was questionable whether the petitioner's purported field of 'Chinese Somatic Science' qualified under the statutory categories of sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.