EB-1A Dismissed โ Swimming (2023): despite the petitioner meeting three initial evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because, despite the petitioner meeting three initial evidentiary criteria, the overall record did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or that she is among the small percentage at the very top of her field. The AAO determined her best swimming times were not highly ranked compared to other international competitors and found her success in collegiate and sectional competitions was not sufficient to demonstrate broad national or international acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.