EB-1A Dismissed โ Teapot Design (2005): did not establish sufficient documentary evidence to meet
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to provide sufficient documentary evidence to meet at least three of the required criteria. For claims of authorship, exhibitions, and high remuneration for his teapot designs, the petitioner provided little to no supporting documentation, such as proof of publication, evidence the exhibitions took place, or records of actual sales. The AAO concluded that the petitioner had not established sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.