dismissed EB-1A Case: Technical Product Management
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria. The AAO specifically rejected the 'published material' criterion, finding that the submitted articles were about the beneficiary's employers and their products, not about the beneficiary himself. The argument to consider this as 'comparable evidence' was also denied because the petitioner did not show that the standard criteria do not readily apply to the beneficiary's occupation.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.
Start a Stronger Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.