Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Technical Product Management (2018): did not establish the beneficiary met at least three of the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria. The AAO specifically rejected the 'published material' criterion, finding that the submitted articles were about the beneficiary's employers and their products, not about the beneficiary himself. The argument to consider this as 'comparable evidence' was also denied because the petitioner did not show that the standard criteria do not readily apply to the beneficiary's occupation.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
High Salary Published Material Original Contributions Leading Or Critical Role Awards
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.