EB-1A Dismissed โ Technology (2019): did not establish he met at least three of the required
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that he met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. The AAO concurred with the Director that the petitioner met the 'judging' criterion, but found the evidence for 'published material' was insufficient because the articles were about his products, not him. Furthermore, the petitioner's evidence for 'original contributions' did not establish that his work was of major significance to the field as a whole.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.