EB-1A Dismissed โ Tennis (2018): did not establish they met at least three of the required
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner, a tennis athlete and coach, failed to demonstrate that they met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. The AAO found that while the petitioner was part of an award-winning team, the national or international significance of the awards was not established. Additionally, the petitioner's memberships did not require outstanding achievements as judged by experts, and awards won by athletes he coached could not be considered his own.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.