dismissed
EB-1A
dismissed EB-1A Case: Unknown
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected because it was filed untimely. The petitioner filed the appeal with the Texas Service Center 36 days after the director's decision was issued, which exceeded the 33-day filing deadline.
Criteria Discussed
Not specified
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
โข Identifying data deleted to prevent clearly unwarr~ted invasion of personal pnvacy PUBLIC COpy FILE: IN RE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Irrrrnigration Services Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 20 Massachusetts Ave .. N.W., MS 2090 Washington. DC 20529-2090 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Date: MAR 1 0 2011 PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)( 1 )(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act; 8 U.s.c. ยง l153(b)(1 )(A) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. If you believe the law was inappropriately applied by us in reaching our decision, or you have additional information that you wish to have considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. The specific requirements for filing such a request can be found at 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5. All motions must be submitted to the office that originally decided your case by filing a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, with a fee of$585. Please be aware that 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5(a)(1)(i) requires that any motion must be filed within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider or reopen. Thank you, Perry Rhew Chief, Administrative Appeals Office www.uscis.gov -Page 2 DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition. The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be rejected as untimely filed. In order to properly file an appeal, the regulation at 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(2)(i) provides that the affected party must file the complete appeal "with the office where the unfavorable decision was made within 30 days of after service of the decision." If the decision was mailed, the appeal must be filed within 33 days. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5a(b). The date of filing is not the date of mailing, but the date of actual receipt. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.2(a)(7)(i). The record indicates that the director issued the decision on June 12, 2009. On motion, the director affirmed his decision on November 30, 2009. It is noted that the director properly gave notice to the petitioner that she had 33 days to file the appeal with the Texas Service Center. On December 30, 2009, the petitioner filed the appeal directly with the AAO. As it was not properly filed, the appeal was returned to the petitioner, and the petitioner filed the appeal with the Texas Service Center on January 5, 2010, 36 days after the decision was issued. Accordingly, the appeal was untimely filed. Neither the Act nor the pertinent regulations grant the AAO authority to extend the 33-day time limit for filing an appeal. As the petitioner failed to properly file the appeal within 33 days with the office that originally made the decision, the appeal must be rejected. ORDER: The appeal is rejected.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.