dismissed EB-1A Case: Unknown

identlfying data deleted tq 
prevenl clearly unwammtd 
invasion of ~nal privaoy . - 
PUBLIC COPY 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
PETITION: 
 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 
203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 153(b)(l)(A) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
Robert P. Wiemann, Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Texas Service 
Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be summarily 
dismissed. , 
The petitioner seeks classification as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. fj 1153(b)(l)(A), as an alien of extraordinary ability. 
The director determined the petitioner had not established the sustained national or international acclaim 
necessary to qualify for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. 
On appeal, counsel states: 
 "On February 9, 2006, the USCIS denied the Petitioner's 1-140 petition for 
Immigrant Worker under the classification of aliens with extraordinary ability. The petitioner believes that 
the evidence provided is sufficient to classify the Petitioner as an alien with extraordinary ability." Counsel 
indicated that a brief andor evidence would be submitted to the AAO within 30 days. The appellate submission 
was unaccompanied by arguments or evidence addressing the pertinent regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. 
fj 204.5(h)(3). 
The appeal was filed on March 9, 2006. As of this date, more than fourteen months later, the AAO has 
received nothing further. 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. fj 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to 
identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
The petitioner has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any additional 
evidence. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.