dismissed
EB-1A
dismissed EB-1A Case: Unknown
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision. The petitioner did not submit a brief or additional evidence, and merely requested that the petition be considered again.
Criteria Discussed
Sustained National Or International Acclaim 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(A)(1)(V) - Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Fact
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 PUBLIC COW @ U. S. Citizenship Identifying data deleted and Immigration +.,, ,CJ Services prevent clearly unwarrPntEd invmbn of personal pm = Z FILE: - Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: NOV 0 2 2005 EAC 05 053 51528 IN RE: PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 3 1153(b)(l)(A) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: SELF-REPRESENTED INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Oflice in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. (J 3 Robert P. Wiemann, Director Administrative Appeals Office Page 2 - DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Vermont Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office on appeal. The appeal will be summarily dismissed. The petitioner seeks classification as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(l)(A), as an alien of extraordinary ability. The director determined the petitioner had not established the sustained national or international acclaim necessary to qualify for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. On appeal, the petitioner states: "My works have gained highly recognized reputation. I have confidence that my skills will benefit the people here if I continue my career in U.S. I respectfully request my petition be considered again. Thank you very much for your time and consideration." The appellate submission was unaccompanied by arguments or evidence addressing the pertinent regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. 5 204.5(h)(3). The petitioner indicated that he was not submitting a separate brief or evidence. As stated in 8 C.F.R. 3 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. The petitioner has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any additional evidence. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.