dismissed EB-1A Case: Unknown

(b)(6)
j 
DATE: OCT 0 3 2013 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER 
IN I(E: Petiti(mer: 
Beneficiary: 
· U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
f.\ dl)jiJJistra~ive Appeals Office (AAO) 
20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
FILE: 
PETITION: · Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Purs1,1antto Section 
203(b)(l)(A) ofthe Immigration and Nationality Act; 8 U.S£.§ ll53(b)(lXA) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTiONS: 
Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) in your case. This is a non­
precedent decision. The AAO does not. announce new constructions of law rior establish agency policy 
through non-precedent decisions. · 
Thank you, 
/Jbl.Ntl~ . 
() Ron Rosenberg . · 
' Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
www.uscis.gov 
(b)(6) NON-PRECEDENT DECISION 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based imm,igra_Qt visa petition was denied by the Director, Texas 
Service.Ctmter, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 011 appeal. The appeal 
·. Will .be dismissed. 
The petitioner seeks classification as an employment-based hnmigtant pursuant to section 
203(b)(i)(A) ofth~ llllll1igration and Nationalit y Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(l)(A) , as an alien 
of extraordinary a_bility. The director determ_ined that the petitioner had not established the requisite 
extraordinary ability through extensive · documentation and sustained 11a.tion~l or international 
acclaim. · · 
A review of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services' records indicates that the petitione~ was 
gra11ted lawft1l p~rm_a.nent residence on May 4, 2013. Therefore, further pursuit of the matter at hand 
is moot. 
\ ' 
ORD~R: The appeal . is dismissed based on the alien's lawful pe1111anent resident status iri the 
United State.s. ·