dismissed EB-1A

dismissed EB-1A Case: Unknown

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Individual ๐Ÿ“‚ Unknown

Decision Summary

The motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed on procedural grounds. It was deemed untimely because it was properly filed with the correct fee 54 days after the AAO's decision, well outside the 30-day limit. The petitioner did not demonstrate that the delay was reasonable or beyond their control, and the motion also failed to include a required statement about judicial proceedings.

Criteria Discussed

8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5(A)(1)(I) - Timely Filing Of A Motion 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5(A)(1)(Iii) - Filing Requirements For A Motion 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5(A)(4) - Dismissal For Not Meeting Requirements

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
Oflee ofAdministrative Appeals MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
PETITION: 
 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 
203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. fj 1 153(b)(l)(A) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
SELF-REPRESENTED 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
If you believe the law was inappropriately applied or you have additional information that you wish to have 
considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. Please refer to 8 C.F.R. fj 103.5 for 
the specific requirements. All motions must be submitted to the office that originally decided your case by 
filing a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, with a fee of $585. Any motion must be filed within 30 
days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider or reopen, as required by 8 C.F.R. fj 103.5(a)(l)(i). 
ting Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Nebraska 
Service Center. The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) dismissed a subsequent appeal.' The 
matter is now before the AAO on motion to reopen and reconsider. The motion will be dismissed 
pursuant to 8 C.F.R. $5 103.5(a)(l)(i), 103.5(a)(l)(iii)(C), and 103.5(a)(4). 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 103.5(a)(l)(i) states in pertinent part that: 
Any motion to reconsider an action by the Service filed by an applicant or petitioner must be 
filed within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider. Any motion to 
reopen a proceeding before the Service filed by an applicant or petitioner, must be filed 
within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks to reopen, except that failure to file 
before this period expires, may be excused in the discretion of the Service where it is 
demonstrated that the delay was reasonable and was beyond the control of the applicant or 
petitioner. 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. tj 103.5(a)(l)(iii) provides: 
(iii) Filing Requirements - A motion shall be submitted on Form I-290B, and may be 
accompanied by a brief. It must be: 
(A) In writing and signed by the affected party or the attorney or representative of 
record, if any; 
(B) Accompanied by a nonrefundable fee as set forth in 5 103.7; 
(C) Accompanied by a statement about whether or not the validity of the unfavorable 
decision has been or is the subject of any judicial proceeding and, if so, the court, nature, 
date, and status or result of the proceeding; 
(D) Addressed to the official having jurisdiction; and; 
(E) Submitted to the office maintaining the record upon which the unfavorable decision 
was made for forwarding to the official having jurisdiction. 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 103.5(a)(l)(i), states that a motion must be filed within 30 days of the 
decision that the motion seeks to reopen or reconsider. The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 103.a(b) states 
that whenever a person is required to act within a prescribed period after the service of a notice upon 
him and the notice is served by mail, three days shall be added to the prescribed period. The AAO 
issued the decision dismissing the petitioner's appeal on October 22,2008. The record indicates that 
the petitioner attempted to file the instant motion with an incorrect fee on November 25, 2008, 34 
days after the decision of the AAO. However, the motion was not accepted by the service center 
1 
 The petitioner was initially represented by on January 9, 2009, the petitioner submitted a letter 
stating that 
 no longer- his leal representative in this matter. 
because it had not been properly filed with the correct fee.2 Motions filed without the proper fee do 
not retain a filing date. 8 C.F.R. 6 103.2(a)(7); see also 8 C.F.R. 6 103.5(a)(l)(iii)(B). OnNovember 
25, 2008, the Nebraska Service Center returned the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, to the 
petitioner indicating that his motion did not include the correct filing fee. The Nebraska Service Center 
received the resubmitted Form I-290B with the proper $585.00 filing fee on December 15, 2008. As 
the Form I-290B submitted by the petitioner on November 25, 2008 did not retain a filing date, the 
actual filing date for the Form I-290B is December 15, 2008, 54 days after the decision was served by 
mail. The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 103.5(a)(l)(i) provides that a late motion may be excused in the 
discretion of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services where it is demonstrated that the 
delay was reasonable and was beyond the control of the applicant or petitioner. In this matter, the 
petitioner's motion was not properly filed within the required thirty days and he has not demonstrated 
that this delay was reasonable and beyond his control. The motion must therefore be dismissed as 
untimely filed. Moreover, the motion does not contain the statement required by 8 C.F.R. 
5 103.5(a)(l)(iii)(C). 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 103.5(a)(4) states that "[a] motion that does not meet applicable 
requirements shall be dismissed." Accordingly, the motion will be dismissed, the proceedings will not 
be reopened, and the previous decisions of the director and the AAO will not be disturbed. 
ORDER: The motion is dismissed. 
2 
 Even if the motion had had been submitted with the proper fee, the motion would have been deemed untimely. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.