dismissed
EB-1A
dismissed EB-1A Case: Unknown
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected because it was filed untimely. The director's decision was issued on March 16, 2010, but the appeal was not received until April 20, 2010, which was 35 days later and outside the 33-day filing period.
Criteria Discussed
Not specified
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
." identifying data deleted to prevent ci.::"-,) .mwarranted invasion of personal privacy PUBUCCOpy U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 20 Massachusetts A "e .. )J, \\'". MS 20YO Washington. DC 20529-2090 u.s. Citizenship and Immigration Services DATE: JAN 1 3 2012 Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER FILE: IN RE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.c. § I I 53(b)(l)(A) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. If you believe the law was inappropriately applied by us in reaching our decision, or you have additional information that you wish to have considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. The specific requirements for filing such a request can be found at 8 C.F.R. § 103.5. All motions must be submitted to the office that originally decided your case by filing a Form 1-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, with a fee of $630. Please be aware that 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i) requires that any motion must be filed within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider or reopen. Thank you, Perry Rhew Chief, Administrative Appeals Office www.lIscis.gov • Page 2 DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Nebraska Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be rejected as untimely filed. In order to properly file an appeal, the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(2)(i) provides that the affected party or the attorney or representative of record must file the complete appeal within 30 days of service of the unfavorable decision. If the decision was mailed, the appeal must be filed within 33 days. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.5a(b). The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § l.l(h) explains that when the last day of a period falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period shall run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. The date of filing is not the date of mailing, but the date of actual receipt. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(a)(7)(i). The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(2)(v)(B)(l) provides that an appeal which is not filed with the time allowed must be rejected as improperly filed. The record indicates that the service center director issued the decision on March 16, 2010. It is noted that the service center director properly gave notice to the petitioner that he had 33 days to file the appeal. Neither the Act nor the pertinent regulations grant the AAO authority to extend this time limit. See Matter of Liadov, 23 I&N Dec. 990 (B1A 2006). Even if the appeal was delayed by the overnight delivery service, the error would not warrant special consideration of the appeal. Id. Although counsel dated the Form 1-290B April 16, 2010, it was not received by the service center until April 20, 2010, or 35 days after the decision was issued. Accordingly, the appeal was untimely filed. The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(2)(v)(8)(2) states that, if an untimely appeal meets the requirements of a motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider, the appeal must be treated as a motion, and a decision must be made on the merits of the case. The official having jurisdiction over a motion is the official who made the last decision in the proceeding, in this case the Director of the Nebraska Service Center. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(ii). The matter will therefore be returned to the director. If the director determines that the late appeal meets the requirements of a motion, the motion shall be granted and a new decision will be issued. As the appeal was untimely filed, the appeal must be rejected. ORDER: The appeal is rejected.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.