dismissed
EB-1A
dismissed EB-1A Case: Unknown
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected as it was filed untimely. The petitioner submitted the appeal 35 days after the director's decision was issued, exceeding the 33-day deadline. The AAO determined the untimely appeal did not meet the requirements to be treated as a motion to reopen or reconsider.
Criteria Discussed
Timeliness Of Appeal
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security identifying data deleted to prevent clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy pUBLlC COPY U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office of Administrative Appeals MS 2090 Washington, DC 20529-2090 U. S. Citizenship and Immigration FILE: office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: RUG 2 5 2010 IN RE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act; 8 U.S.C. $ 1153(b)(l)(A) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: SELF-REPRESENTED INSTRUCTIONS : Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. If you believe the law was inappropriately applied by us in reaching our decision, or you have additional information that you wish to have considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. The specific requirements for filing such a request can be found at 8 C.F.R. $ 103.5. All motions must be submitted to the office that originally decided your case by filing a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, with a fee of $585. Please be aware that 8 C.F.R. $ 103.5(a)(l)(i) requires that any motion must be filed within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider or reopen. Thank you, #& 5% Perry Rhew Chief, Administrative Appeals Office Page 2 DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition. The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be rejected as untimely filed. In order to properly file an appeal, the regulation at 8 C.F.R. 103.3(a)(2)(i) provides that the affected party must file the complete appeal within 30 days after service of the unfavorable decision. If the decision was mailed, the appeal must be filed within 33 days. See 8 C.F.R. 103.5a(b). The date of filing is not the date of mailing, but the date of actual receipt. See 8 C.F.R. 5 103.2(a)(7)(i). The record indicates that the director issued the decision on July 7, 2009. It is noted that the director properly gave notice to the petitioner that it had 33 days to file the appeal. Although the petitioner dated the appeal on August 4, 2009, it was received by the director on Tuesday, August 11, 2009, 35 days after the decision was issued. Accordingly, the appeal was untimely filed. Neither the Act nor the pertinent regulations grant the AAO authority to extend the 33-day time limit for filing an appeal. The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(a)(2)(v)(B)(2) states that, if an untimely appeal meets the requirements of a motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider, the appeal must be treated as a motion, and a decision must be made on the merits of the case. A motion must meet all of the regulatory requirements under 8 C.F.R. 5 103.5(a) at the time it is filed. A motion to reopen must state the new facts to be proved in the reopened proceeding and be supported by affidavits or other documentary evidence. 8 C.F.R. 6 103.5(a)(2). A motion to reconsider must state the reasons for reconsideration and be supported by any pertinent precedent decisions to establish that the decision was based on an incorrect application of law or Service policy. A motion to reconsider a decision on an application or petition must, when filed, also establish that the decision was incorrect based on the evidence of record at the time of the initial decision. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5(a)(3). A motion that does not meet applicable requirements shall be dismissed. 8 C.F.R. 5 103.5(a)(4). Here, the untimely appeal did not meet the requirements of a motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider at the time it was filed. Therefore, there is no requirement to treat the appeal as a motion under 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(a)(2)(v)(B)(2). As the appeal was untimely filed and does not qualify as a motion, the appeal must be rejected. ORDER: The appeal is rejected.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.