dismissed EB-1A Case: Unspecified

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
P~J~~Ic copy 
Q%-+ 
@ 
u.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
e%,l, ,, Services 
dmtifybg data deleted to 
Plpvent dearly unwmmted 
b=don of personal privacy 
m FILE: - office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER me: NOV 0 2 2005 
EAC 05 060 52323 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 
203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 3 1153(b)(l)(A) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
SELF-REPRESENTED 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
5 Robert P. Wiemann, Director 
Administrative Appeals Office 
- Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Vermont 
Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office on appeal. The appeal will be summarily 
dismissed. 1 
8 
The petitioner seeks classification as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 8 1153(b)(l)(A), as an alien of extraordinary ability. 
The director determined the petitioner had not established the sustained national or international acclaim 
necessary to qualify for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. 
On appeal, the petitioner states: 
My qualified ability in the field has obtained distinguished reputation. I could bring my professional 
skills to the people here without hesitation if I could continue my career in U.S. I hereby expectantly 
request my petition be considered again. Your elaborative reconsideration is highly appreciated. Thank 
you very much for your time and consideration. 
The appellate submission was unaccompanied by arguments or evidence addressing the pertinent regulatory 
criteria at 8 C.F.R. $ 204.5(h)(3). The petitioner indicated that he was not submitting a separate brief or 
evidence. 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. 8 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to 
identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
The petitioner has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any additional 
evidence. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.