EB-1A Dismissed โ Urology (2008): the motion to reopen was granted, but the prior decision to
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen was granted, but the prior decision to dismiss the appeal was affirmed. The AAO found that the petitioner, a postdoctoral fellow, failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim, concluding he met only two of the required three criteria. The evidence for original contributions of major significance and playing a leading or critical role was deemed insufficient, and his overall accomplishments did not place him at the very top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.