Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Visual Arts (2024): the motion to reopen was dismissed for failing to state new
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen was dismissed for failing to state new facts. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the petitioner did not demonstrate that the AAO erred in its prior decision; specifically, the petitioner failed to prove their award met the criteria for national or international recognition, and the claim regarding scholarly articles was not considered because it was improperly raised for the first time on appeal.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Display Of Work Published Material About The Alien Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Original Contributions Of Major Significance Leading Or Critical Role High Salary Or Other Significant Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.