EB-1A Dismissed โ Wig Design: did not establish they met at least three of the required
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate they met at least three of the required criteria to establish sustained national or international acclaim. The evidence submitted for membership in associations, authorship of articles, and display of work at exhibitions was found to be insufficient and lacking proof of significance or prestige. The AAO concluded the petitioner had not shown she was among the small percentage at the very top of her field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.