Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Aerospace Engineering (2024): the AAO determined the petitioner satisfied a third
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO determined the petitioner satisfied a third evidentiary criterion, 'authorship of scholarly articles', which the Director had incorrectly denied based on outdated guidance. Having met the threshold of three criteria, the case was sent back to the Director to conduct a final merits determination on the totality of the evidence.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Participation As A Judge Of The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.