Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Ai And Telecommunications (2024): the AAO found the Director erred by overlooking key evidence
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found the Director erred by overlooking key evidence. The AAO determined the petitioner did satisfy the criteria for authoring scholarly articles and making original contributions of major significance, in addition to the one criterion the Director had already granted. Since the petitioner now met the initial requirement of satisfying at least three criteria, the case was sent back for a final merits determination.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Leading Or Critical Role Scholarly Articles Original Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.