Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Anatomy (2022): the Director's decision was procedurally deficient
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's decision was procedurally deficient. The AAO found that the Request for Evidence (RFE) did not provide adequate notice of the deficiencies, and the denial decision failed to provide a complete analysis or explanation for the denial. The case was sent back for further review and the entry of a new, fully reasoned decision.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Awards Published Material Original Contributions Scholarly Articles Judging
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.