Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning (2024): the AAO found the Director erred by not crediting the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found the Director erred by not crediting the Petitioner with meeting the 'original contributions of major significance' criterion, which brought her to the required three evidentiary criteria. However, the matter was sent back for a new decision because the AAO found the Petitioner had not yet demonstrated her intent to continue working in her field in the United States.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Receipt Of Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Awards Published Material About The Petitioner Original Contributions Of Major Significance High Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.