Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded โ Arts (2017): the Director initially denied the petition, concluding the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition, concluding the petitioner did not intend to continue working in her area of expertise because her experience was as a performer but her intent was to teach. The AAO remanded the matter because the Director failed to first evaluate whether the petitioner met the underlying extraordinary ability criteria before considering if she intended to continue working in her field in the U.S. The case was sent back for proper sequential analysis.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Awards Membership Published Material Judging Original Contributions Scholarly Articles Display At Artistic Exhibitions Or Showcases Comparable Evidence Intent To Continue Work In The Area Of Extraordinary Ability
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.