Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Athletics: the director misapplied the regulations
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the director misapplied the regulations. The director incorrectly required evidence of full-time employment and high remuneration, which is not explicitly mandated by the statute. The AAO also noted the director failed to provide any analysis of the evidence regarding the petitioner's sustained acclaim, precluding a meaningful appeal on that issue.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Continuing Work In The Area Of Expertise High Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.