Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Biochemistry (2023): the Director failed to adequately analyze the evidence
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director failed to adequately analyze the evidence supporting the petitioner's claim of making original contributions of major significance. The Director did not properly consider detailed endorsement letters, evidence of collaboration with a pharmaceutical company, or grant awards for commercialization. The AAO found the denial lacked sufficient explanation and sent the case back for a new decision that properly evaluates all submitted evidence.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Original Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.