Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Bioinformatics (2023): the Director's denial decision contained significant
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's denial decision contained significant factual errors, including references to evidence that the petitioner did not submit and using incorrect pronouns. The AAO also found that the Director's analysis of the 'original contributions' criterion was conclusory and did not sufficiently explain the reasons for denial, warranting a new decision based on a proper review of the record.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.