Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Broadcast Journalism (2022): the Director's decision was procedurally flawed
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's decision was procedurally flawed. Although the Director acknowledged the petitioner met three evidentiary criteria, the final merits determination failed to analyze the totality of the evidence provided. The AAO remanded the case for a new decision that properly considers all evidence to determine if the petitioner has sustained acclaim and is at the top of their field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Published Material In Professional Or Major Media Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Membership In Associations Requiring Outstanding Achievements Original Contributions Of Major Significance Leading Or Critical Role For Organizations With A Distinguished Reputation
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.