Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Business (2024): the AAO disagreed with the Director's conclusions
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The case was remanded because the AAO disagreed with the Director's conclusions. The AAO determined that the petitioner's proposed work in consulting on religious freedom and diversity qualified under the statutory field of 'business'. Furthermore, the AAO found that the petitioner did meet the evidentiary criterion for judging the work of others, contrary to the Director's finding, and thus satisfied at least two criteria.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Leading Or Critical Roles Nationally Recognized Awards Memberships Published Material About The Alien Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles High Salary/Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.