Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Business (2024): the Director initially found the petitioner met only two of
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The Director initially found the petitioner met only two of the required three evidentiary criteria. The AAO determined that the Director incorrectly dismissed evidence for the 'published material' criterion, finding the evidence of press coverage in major media was sufficient. Because the petitioner now meets the threshold of three criteria, the case was remanded for the Director to conduct a final merits determination.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Participation As A Judge Of The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Published Material About The Petitioner Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.