Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Business And Invention (2024): the Director's denial was procedurally deficient
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's denial was procedurally deficient. The AAO found that the Director failed to provide a complete analysis, did not fully explain the reasons for denial regarding several evidentiary criteria, and improperly dismissed evidence, including certified translations, without adequate reasoning. The matter was sent back for a new decision with a thorough review of all submitted evidence.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Published Material About The Alien In Professional Or Major Trade Publications Or Other Major Media Evidence Of The Alien'S Leading Or Critical Role For Organizations Or Establishments That Have A Distinguished Reputation
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.