remanded
EB-1A
remanded EB-1A Case: Cancer Biology Research
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO determined the petitioner satisfied three initial evidentiary criteria, contrary to the Director's decision which found only one was met. The AAO found the petitioner's peer-review activities met the judging criterion and his high citation record met the original contributions criterion. The case was sent back for the Director to conduct a final merits determination, which had not been previously performed.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.