Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Cancer Biology Research (2024): the AAO determined the petitioner satisfied three initial
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO determined the petitioner satisfied three initial evidentiary criteria, contrary to the Director's decision which found only one was met. The AAO found the petitioner's peer-review activities met the judging criterion and his high citation record met the original contributions criterion. The case was sent back for the Director to conduct a final merits determination, which had not been previously performed.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.