Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Corporate Product Strategy (2023): the Director denied the petition, finding the beneficiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The Director denied the petition, finding the beneficiary met only one of the three claimed criteria. On appeal, the AAO found that the petitioner did provide sufficient evidence to meet all three criteria, specifically for 'original contributions' and 'high salary'. The AAO determined the Director improperly dismissed evidence, including expert letters and industry publications, and remanded the case for a new decision.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Original Contributions Of Major Significance Performance In Leading Or Critical Roles High Salary, Or Other Significantly High Remuneration, In Relation To Others
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.