Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Data Analysis (2024): the Director's initial decision was insufficient for review
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's initial decision was insufficient for review. The Director conflated the criteria for the requested EB-1A classification with those for a National Interest Waiver and failed to analyze the evidence submitted by the Petitioner for the three claimed criteria. The AAO determined the case must be re-evaluated under the correct legal framework.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Membership In Associations In The Field Performance In Leading Or Critical Roles Comparable Evidence
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.