Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Dermatology (2025): the Director's decision was procedurally flawed
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's decision was procedurally flawed. The Director failed to address two of the five claimed criteria (membership and high salary) and did not provide an adequate analysis of the evidence submitted for the 'original contributions of major significance' criterion.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Memberships In Associations Requiring Outstanding Achievements Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Commanding A High Salary
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.