Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Engineering (2023): the Director did not sufficiently analyze two of the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director did not sufficiently analyze two of the claimed regulatory criteria. The Director failed to adequately discuss the evidence related to the petitioner's receipt of a lesser national or international award (a military medal) and whether he performed in a leading or critical role for a distinguished organization.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Lesser National Or International Awards Membership In Associations Judge Of The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Display Of Work At Exhibitions Or Showcases Leading Or Critical Role High Salary Or Other Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.