remanded
EB-1A
remanded EB-1A Case: Environmental Science
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The Director found the petitioner only met two of the three claimed criteria. The AAO disagreed, finding that the petitioner did establish the criterion for original contributions of major significance based on evidence of her widely cited research and detailed expert letters attesting to its impact. Since the petitioner met the minimum three criteria, the case was remanded for a final merits determination.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.