Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Footwear Development (2025): the Director failed to conduct a proper final merits
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director failed to conduct a proper final merits determination as required by USCIS policy. The Director did not consider the totality of the evidence, specifically disregarding highly probative materials like the Beneficiary's U.S. patents, product designs, and business contributions. The case was sent back for a new determination that considers the entire record.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role Published Material About The Beneficiary High Salary Or Other Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.