remanded
EB-1A
remanded EB-1A Case: Footwear Development
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director failed to conduct a proper final merits determination as required by USCIS policy. The Director did not consider the totality of the evidence, specifically disregarding highly probative materials like the Beneficiary's U.S. patents, product designs, and business contributions. The case was sent back for a new determination that considers the entire record.
Criteria Discussed
Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role Published Material About The Beneficiary High Salary Or Other Remuneration
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.