Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Forensic Science (2024): the AAO found the petitioner met the minimum three
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found the petitioner met the minimum three evidentiary criteria, contrary to the Director's initial decision which only found one. The AAO determined the petitioner satisfied the 'judging' and 'scholarly articles' criteria in addition to the 'awards' criterion. The case was sent back to the Director for a final merits determination based on the totality of the evidence.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Awards Judging Original Contributions Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role High Salary
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.