remanded
EB-1A
remanded EB-1A Case: Forestry
Decision Summary
The director's decision was withdrawn and the case was remanded. The AAO found that the petitioner did overcome the initial grounds for denial by providing sufficient evidence of his intent to continue working in his field in the United States. However, the case was remanded because the director's decision failed to properly analyze whether the petitioner's evidence met the specific regulatory criteria for establishing sustained national or international acclaim.
Criteria Discussed
Intent To Continue Work In Area Of Expertise Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Membership In Associations Requiring Outstanding Achievement Judging The Work Of Others
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.