Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Fund Management (2022): the Director's denial was flawed
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's denial was flawed. The Director improperly penalized the petitioner for not meeting criteria that were never claimed, contradicted their own finding that the beneficiary held a leading or critical role, and failed to conduct a proper final merits determination by not weighing all the evidence in its totality.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role High Salary Or Other Significantly High Remuneration Original Contributions Of Major Significance Prizes Or Awards Published Material About The Beneficiary
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.