Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Hair Styling (2022): the Director initially found the petitioner met only two of
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The Director initially found the petitioner met only two of the required three evidentiary criteria. The AAO determined that the petitioner also met a third criterion, 'display of the alien's work in the field at artistic exhibitions or showcases,' based on her participation in competitions and fashion shows. Because the petitioner met the initial threshold of three criteria, the case was remanded for the Director to conduct a final merits determination.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Published Material About The Alien Judging The Work Of Others Display Of Work At Artistic Exhibitions Or Showcases
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.