Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Horse Training (2023): the Director failed to properly consider the petitioner's
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director failed to properly consider the petitioner's arguments for using comparable evidence. The Director's decision did not reflect any consideration of the petitioner's claim that the standard criteria did not readily apply to the beneficiary's occupation as a horse trainer. The case was sent back for the Director to properly analyze the comparable evidence claims before making a final merits determination.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Major Internationally Recognized Award Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Membership In Associations Published Material About The Alien Leading Or Critical Role Comparable Evidence
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.