Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Human Rights Activism (2022): the Director's decision did not adequately explain the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's decision did not adequately explain the reasons for the denial and improperly applied the final merits determination standard when evaluating individual criteria. The AAO found that the Director failed to provide analysis for some criteria and mischaracterized evidence for others, requiring a new, properly reasoned decision.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Awards Memberships Published Material About The Petitioner Judging Original Contributions Scholarly Articles Artistic Display Leading Or Critical Role
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.