Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Information Science And Engineering (2022): the Director had determined the petitioner only met two of
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The Director had determined the petitioner only met two of the three claimed criteria. The AAO reviewed the evidence and found the petitioner also satisfied the criterion for original contributions of major significance. Because the petitioner overcame the only stated ground for denial, the case was remanded for a final merits determination.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Participation As A Judge Of The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.