Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Information Technology (2020): the Director initially acknowledged in a Request for
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director initially acknowledged in a Request for Evidence (RFE) that the petitioner met two criteria (published material and high salary) but then failed to consider them in the final denial. The AAO determined this was an error and sent the case back for the Director to properly evaluate these two criteria before making a new decision.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Awards Membership Published Material About The Alien Original Contributions Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role High Salary
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.