remanded
EB-1A
remanded EB-1A Case: Information Technology
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found that the Director erred in their assessment of key evidentiary criteria. While agreeing the beneficiary met the 'authorship of scholarly articles' criterion, the AAO disagreed with the Director's negative findings on the 'leading or critical role' and 'high salary' criteria, necessitating a new decision based on the AAO's analysis.
Criteria Discussed
Published Material Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role High Salary
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.