Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Information Technology (2024): the AAO found that the Director erred in their assessment
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found that the Director erred in their assessment of key evidentiary criteria. While agreeing the beneficiary met the 'authorship of scholarly articles' criterion, the AAO disagreed with the Director's negative findings on the 'leading or critical role' and 'high salary' criteria, necessitating a new decision based on the AAO's analysis.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Published Material Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role High Salary
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.