Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Investment Fund Management (2024): the AAO found the petitioner satisfied two additional
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found the petitioner satisfied two additional evidentiary criteria that the Director had denied: published materials about him in major media and his performance in a leading role for an organization with a distinguished reputation. By meeting a total of three criteria, the petitioner is now eligible for a final merits determination on his extraordinary ability claim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Published Material About The Alien Leading Or Critical Role High Salary Or Other Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.