Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Legal Science And Law (2024): the record of proceeding was incomplete, as several
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the record of proceeding was incomplete, as several exhibits the petitioner submitted were missing. The Director also erred by concluding that the petitioner's background as a lawyer automatically barred her from the classification, without sufficiently analyzing whether her work fell within the statutory field of 'business' as she claimed.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Major Internationally Recognized Award Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Published Material About The Alien Participation As A Judge Of The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role High Salary Or Other Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.