Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Marketing And Advertising (2020): the Director's denial lacked a detailed analysis of the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's denial lacked a detailed analysis of the evidence submitted by the petitioner. The AAO found that the Director failed to properly evaluate published articles, did not sufficiently review the extensive evidence for original contributions, and incorrectly stated the petitioner did not address the high salary criterion in the RFE response.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Published Material About The Alien In Professional Or Major Trade Publications Or Other Major Media Original Scientific, Scholarly, Artistic, Athletic, Or Business-Related Contributions Of Major Significance High Salary Or Other Significantly High Remuneration For Services
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.